Effects of Post-Harvest Handling on Maize Farmers’ Income in Nkoma Sub County Kamwenge District
Loading...
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Bishop Stuart University
Abstract
This study was on the effect of post-harvest handling on maize farmers’ income in Nkoma Sub County, Kamwenge District. The study objectives were to: identify post-harvest handling
technologies and practices on maize farmers’ income; establish the role of training in post-harvest
handling technologies on maize farmers’ income; assess the effects of the post-harvest technologies
and practices on the incomes of maize farmers. The study adopted a cross-sectional survey design
applying quantitative and qualitative approaches for data collection. Data was captured from a
sample of 150 respondents using both questionnaire and interviews. Data was analyzed using SPSS
version 16 to generate both descriptive and inferential statistics. The study identified different post harvest handling technologies and practices used by maize farmers in Nkoma sub-county,
Kamwenge District such as; threshing, drying, storage, winnowing, shelling, grading and packing.
The study identified that there were factors affecting the use of maize post-harvest handling
technologies on Smallholder maize farmer’s income. These were; price fluctuation of maize grains,
human and financial capital, excessive field heats and lack of on-farm storage facilities and
knowledge on post-harvest handling practices. The study further concluded that specific post harvest technologies/practices had an effect on household income generated. Technologies/practices
such as; drying (p< 0.002), storage (p<0.00), winnowing (p<0.01), grading and packaging
(p<0.001) presented a significant association with household income. The study concluded that
different post-harvest handling technologies/practices such as; drying, storage, winnowing, grading
and packaging have a significant contribution on household income however the rate of use of these
practices is still low due to different socio-economic and institutional factors. The study therefore
recommended more education for farmers on the technologies since this influences farmers’
decision to adopt technologies. Farmers should be assisted in acquiring value addition facilities such
as threshing and grinding machines to improve packaging. Farmers must be supported through
credit services so to acquire advanced postharvest handling technologies and equipment.
Description
Keywords
Effects, Post-harvest handling, maize farmers’ income